CAP Reform News

April 18, 2013 12:00 am

A fair amount of progress on CAP reform has been made this month.  This looks positive for a ‘political’ agreement to be reached by the end-of-June deadline set by the Irish Presidency.  There is still a lot of ground to be covered, but the respective positions of the European Parliament and EU Farm Ministers appear to be converging, making a speedy conclusion possible over the next three months.

Positions Agreed

We reported in the January Bulletin on how the Agriculture Committee (COMAGRI) of the European Parliament had reached a compromise.  The full Parliament voted on the CAP reform dossier at the start of the month.  Only a few minor changes from the COMAGRI position were made.

European Farm Ministers also agreed their negotiating position at their meeting on the 19th March.  This allows ‘Trialogue’ meetings between the Farm Council (Ministers), the Parliament and the EU Commission to begin.  The aim is to have an agreement concluded by the 24th or 25th June.

Summary

The table below givesa summary of the final positions adopted by the Parliament and the Farm Council and compares them with the original Commission proposals.  It is an update of a similar table we published back in June 2012.  It can be seen that there has been quite a lot of movement and that the positions are not too far apart on many issues.  However, it is worth reiterating that ‘nothing is decided until everything is decided’. 

SUMMARY OF CAP REFORM – MARCH 2013

 

Original Commission Proposals Oct 2011

European Parliament‚

EU Farm Ministersƒ

FUNDING

Pillar 1

30% of the gap between a Member State’s average payment rate and 90% of the EU average payment should be closed by 2020

Complex, but essentially a faster rate of convergence between member States than the Commission proposals.

As per Commission.

Pillar 2

Vague – proposal only states allocation will take into account ‘objective criteria’ and ‘past performance’

Split of funding between Member States not covered.

Budget deal (MFF) gave specific RD ‘sweeteners’ to some countries but overall allocation unclear.

Modulation

Transfer of 10% of funding between Pillars allowed.

Transfer up to 15% allowed.  No requirement to match-fund modulation money

As per EP

Financial Discipline

Current rules retained

No €5,000 exemption for smallest claimants

Only farms receiving less than €2,000 per year would be exempt

BASIC PAYMENT SCHEME (BPS) ENTITLEMENTS AND PAYMENTS

Entitlement Roll-over

Re-grant of entitlements in first year of new Basic Payment Scheme (BPS)

Countries with regional payment systems (i.e. England) can ‘recycle’ existing entitlements – i.e. no new grant

As per EP

2011 Link

Only able to establish new BPS entitlements if applicant made a valid claim in 2011

2009 and 2010 can be used as well as 2011.  ‘Golden ticket’ can be split

2010 or 2011 to be used.  ‘Golden ticket’ can be split

 

 


 

Original Commission Proposals Oct 2011

European Parliament‚

EU Farm Ministersƒ

Number of Entitlements

New BPS entitlements will be equal to land claimed in first year of the BPS scheme (2015)

As per Commission

As per Commission BUT alternative of issuing entitlements based on the number claimed in 2012, 2013 or 2014

Limiting Extra Entitlements

No measures

No measures

Can be limited to an increase of 35% over number of entitlements declared in 2009.  Also possible to limit the number of payment entitlements on grassland in LFA/AwNC areas

Historic to Regional Phasing (‘Internal Convergence’)

40% regional in first year, five years of phasing to flat rate

10% regional in first year.  Change in entitlement values 2014 to 2019 can be limited to 30%.  No requirement for full convergence by end of period – payments could be in the range 80% to 120% of regional average

10% regional in first year.  No minimum rate of convergence by 2019 set out 

‘GREENING’

‘Equivalence’

Only organic farmers exempt from greening requirements

Situation unclear as ‘equivalence’ measures rejected by full EP.  Likely to be reinstated during negotiations however

Farms where 75% of the land area was covered by national or regional environmental schemes could be automatically eligible for greening payments

Greening Penalties

Have to undertake greening otherwise penalties apply to BPS

Failure to undertake greening only affects 30% greening element

Failure to undertake greening only affects 30% greening element but additional 25% penalty would apply

Double Funding

Not mentioned

Not allowed

Seems possible – although text is unclear

Crop Diversification

Farmers with more than 3 Ha of ‘arable’ land required to have 3 crops – min and max percentages

Only 2 crops required for arable areas of 10-30 Ha.  Three crops above 30 Ha and no crop to cover more than 75% of the farm area

As per EP.  Various other exemptions.  Spring and winter varieties to be treated as different ‘crops’

Permanent Grassland

95% of grass five years old or longer in the first year of the scheme must be retained

Test to be 7 years rather than 5.  Obligation can be applied at a national or regional basis rather than at farm level  

5 year test retained.  Obligation can be applied at a national or regional basis rather than at farm level 

Ecological Focus Areas

7% of area eligible for BPS must be in EFA.  ‘Landscape features’ can count towards EFA

EFA only to apply to holdings above 10 Ha. 3% EFA rising to 5% in 2016 with a possible rise to 7% by 2017.  Nitrogen fixing crops, cover crops, energy crops to eligible EFA land

 

EFA only to apply to holdings above 15 Ha. 5% EFA with a possible rise to 7% by 2017.  Eligible land as per EP


 

Original Commission Proposals Oct 2011

European Parliament‚

EU Farm Ministersƒ


TOP-UPS

Coupled Payments

Up to 5% of a country’s BPS funds could be used for coupled payments.  Rising to 10% where such payments had been at more than 10% in 2010-13

Coupled payments should be able to comprise 15% of BPS funds

7% funds possible to coupled payments or 12% where use was above 10% historically (note: Scotland’s current use would not be above the 10% threshold)

Small Farm Supplement

No measures

An additional payment may be made on the first 50 hectares of entitlements (or average farm size) annually.  This top-up to be no more than 65% of the regional average payment and limited to 30% of BPS funds

Largely as  per EP

Small Farmers Scheme

Compulsory for Member States

Should be voluntary

Should be voluntary

Young Farmers Scheme

Compulsory for Member States

Should remain compulsory – and scope extended

Should be voluntary

Areas with Natural Constraints

Top-up payment from Pillar 1 funds possible limited to 5% of funds

As per Commission

As per Commission

PAYMENT LIMITS

Capping

BPS reduced in bands from €150,000.  Nothing additional after €300,000.   Labour mitigation element

As per Commission

Optional for Member States

Active Farmer

Two-part test: 1. Direct payments must be at least 5% of total farm receipts 2. claimed areas must be kept in good condition or have minimum agricultural activity levels (MS to set rules)

Delete 5% test.  Have a mandatory EU-wide ‘negative list’ of no-eligible claimants which Member States could amend.  Member States must draw up rules to ensure payments are only made on areas being actively farmed

Member States must set out rules on minimum activity levels for payments to be made.  Member States to decide whether to have a ‘negative list’ of ineligible claimants

OTHER POINTS

Sugar Quota

To be ended after 2014/15

Extended to 2019/20 marketing year

Extended to 2016/17 marketing year

Exchange Rate

 

Use the September month average currency rates to convert payment for non-Euro countries.

Use current 30th Sept date.

LFA Reclassification

Move to ‘Areas with Natural Constraints’ as part of Rural Development package

More details on re-designation requested.  Possible delay to 2016

Member States need more flexibility on how the new areas are defined

 For more details see our Technical Note of 25th October 2011.  ‚ As per the full Parliament compromise   ƒ As per the Farm Council compromise.  Note, the Budget Deal signed by Heads of State in February (see Bulletin 02(13)) is a ‘Council of Ministers’ decision and therefore elements of that deal influence the Farm Council’s position where relevant – i.e. capping, modulation etc.


Categorised in: